The word ‘Illegal’ is racist? In what dictionary?

Shut down this site: Drop the ‘I’ Word

Such a beautiful woman, disappointing that foul words spew from those lips

Monica Novoa, this is a public notice challenge to you, to present proof of concept that the word ILLEGAL is a racist term. The following will demonstrate to you, a supposed educated woman on what a racist slur is. Let’s give you a little help to understand that each slur you will find in the following is considered racist and each is definitive of a specific race of inhabitants of this world.

*Disclaimer: The following depicts sensitive and non-PC language. I am in no way a racists, but I am a firm believer that being politically correct is for those that are afraid to stand up for themselves and what they believe in. Though the following slurs are extremely racists and can cause extreme anger in some readers, remember that the following is for explanatory purposes only.

In the beginning of American history, the Injun’s encountered the Moon Crickets. Once Whitey established themselves, they found it easier to get someone else to do the hard labor. They sent ships to Africa and China to round-up Jungle Bunnies, Knuckle-Draggers, Rail Hoppers and Coolies. The Crackers kept Pickaninnies away from normal society, which was wrong and Abraham Lincoln freed what was once coined “Lincolns Mistake.” Beach Niggers began to hear their slave boys use a term to refer to each other intimately just between their own race, but Whitey wanted to be Wiggers and typical Honkies, so they adapted to calling the blacks Niggers as well. Even early in history there were Chocolate Dippers and Powder Fuckers producing Oreos and Urban Zebras

Later in history, Guerro’s battled the Spic’s, and for retribution from the loss to the US, the Wetbacks, Scratchbacks and Chili-Shitters began to cross into the US, legally of course. A few more battles between the US and other nations, involved the Yankees against the Nips, Charlies, Gooks, and Japs. Another war, but for the masses with the Boxheads or Nazis if you will, being their natural Jew-Killer selves, executing most likely the largest destruction of a race ever the Bagel-Dog, Hooknose Jews. This war culminated into a conglomerate of multi-races fighting such as the Red Pinko Commies, Tommy Tea Bag Brits, Dago Zip Grape Stompers and Chink Cookies.

After the major wars, life resumed in the US for the Rednecks and White Trash and their Ditchpigs living side by side with the Ghetto Brothers and Nappy-headed Hoes (courtesy of Don Imus) with their Ghetto Hamsters. Slowly the Beaner Taco Bender population began to grow rapidly with the Wetbacks and Scratchbacks making a run for the border in an attempt to perform in the Border Hopper olympics. This gave rise to more Oreos and zebras. Then the Yellow Zipperhead Slanteyes began immigrating making fun of the Roundeyes as they saw them walking the streets. Soon the US had become a melting pot, with Cab Niggers, Camel Jockies, Towel-heads and Flips and Gwats rushing in like water from the New Orleans Damn that broke.

All that is said and done, those Diaper headed Sand Niggers caused pandemonium and chaos for the US by killing thousands of Honkies, Niggers, Beaners, Jews, Zips, Chinks, Guidos and the like, even their own Fig Gobblers. For once in the history of the US, Whitey, Brothers, Spics, Kikes, Chinos, Yokos and Camel Cowboys united as one nation to rebuild and become stronger. The difference between these races and some of the Knuckle-Draggers, Wetbacks, Jews, Gooks and Sand-Niggers coming today… The unity was of LEGAL patriotic US citizens who pride themselves in loving this country and abiding and assimilating into the culture and laws. Unlike the ILLEGAL aliens, who come to this country, show patriotism not for the US but for their homeland (want proof, watch which flags rise up during marches and demonstrations), they do not assimilate and do not abide by the rules of the US, therefore they are breaking the law which is… ILLEGAL.

Understanding the term “racist slur” means comprehending the term “race.” All of the preceding slurs referred to a specific race, or common denominator physical characteristic of each group of people. The attempt within the stated website and Monica Novoa, and by the supportive derelict enemies of the United States is to essentially de-criminalize illegal aliens by taking out the word ILLEGAL. You may call it what you will;

but these cancerous parasites coming into this country ILLEGALLY are breaking the law, therefore they are performing an ILLEGAL act and since the governmental definition of an alien is any foreign person entering the US that is not a citizen, they are essentially ILLEGAL ALIENS. If you want to change the name, then lets come up with more precise terminology for these infesting law-breaking cretins such as;

  • Criminal Aliens/Immigrants
  • Crooked Aliens/Immigrants
  • Lawless Aliens/Immigrants
  • Undesirable Aliens/Immigrants
  • Unwanted Aliens/Immigrants

A quick look at one of the “terms” that this self-proclaimed “educated” woman, Monica Novoa, coined, NAFTA refugees. Are you not aware what NAFTA stands for, let alone what a refugee is? In case you were asleep during lectures in your useless path to an English degree let us refresh your memory.

NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Act which essentially lifted all non-tariff boundaries between Canada, North American and Mexico and eliminated most trade tariffs between the three countries immediately.

A refugee is an individual fleeing from some type of danger or political persecution. or one seeking asylum (most if not all the time from a country)

So logically let us get this correct Monica Novoa, you are basically telling the United States and its media by using the term of “NAFTA Refugee,” that these ILLEGAL aliens are seeking asylum in the United States from a trade agreement?

This fight and your explanation for removing the “I” word or “ILLEGAL” is baseless on the pure evidence that regardless of any means to “humanize” these ILLEGAL aliens, is still calling them ILLEGAL aliens, since what they are doing is illegal. By dropping this attempt at of mass asylum for ILLEGAL aliens, you will essentially save face from the American citizens whom have seen their rights taken away, and their liberties and freedoms givien away to those undeserving of such special treatment.

Interested parties of this article, how would you vote on this if it was put on the November ballot and why?

Why are criminals fighting to be laywers?

U.S. News – Can an illegal immigrant become a lawyer?.

Jose Manuel Godinez-Samperi

Political correctness is disregarded herein after. Why is it that Florida, the geriatric, capital of the US is the host of some of the most insane occurrences in the United States? They had

Casey Anthony, the murderer of her young daughter (Yes she murdered her daughter, I said it so what), then they have the Trayvon Martin case who was murdered in cold-blood by a wanna be cop (George Zimmerman) who is using the most insanely idiotic law of self-preservation I have ever heard (Stand your ground) and now an illegal immigrant, Jose Manuel Godinez-Samperio, mind you whom is breaking the law, is fighting to become a lawyer in the United States.

Oddly enough as it seems, that an illegal wants to become a lawyer and uphold the law of the land, that of which he is clearly breaking, the screwed up rotting brains of the decrepid geezers of the Florida Supreme Court are actually going to look into whether or not this illegal has the right to practice law in the US. Hey old gas-passers, here is the quick answer for you, “No, he is breaking the law already, so how can someone who is breaking the law be capable of defending the law.” Who cares if he was brought here by his illegal alien parents, he is still an illegal and should have no rights to become a lawyer, let alone should have been allowed to go to schools, get a law degree in an US university (without a green card or visa) and should definitely not be living here.

If this illegal scum wins his case, can you just imagine the consequences it would have on the legal system and the floodgates of illegals thinking they can sue to work here, get free aid and do what they please, all while breaking the law. This piece of Mexican trash is going to do one thing and one thing only if he wins, and that is fight and tie up the legal systems with frivolous lawsuits for illegal immigrants. I would say that any other state would look at his claim and laugh it off and tell him to leave. Oh contraire, where I live (The good ol’ safe haven for illegal aliens, California) the idiots in our Supreme Court would not only consider it, but also take him to lunch, wine and dine and find out what more he desires. Then Tony Villar (that is the male form of the name of LA Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa) would take him on the Long Beach Yacht that is wasting tax payers dollars (yes it is a yacht you illiterate dumbo-eared poor excuse for a mayor), and offer him a key to the city along with all of the free perks he desires. So Florida and California in this writers opinions are the worse places to be an American citizen, because here, the illegal pieces of trash from Mexico and any other degenerated country have more rights in these two states then naturally born citizens.

How can someone who is breaking the law even be considered for a law practice in the United States, if they are breaking the law already? Isn’t that like giving a bank robber a job at the National Treasury? Why can they be trusted to uphold law-abiding employment and trust when they are criminals.

What are your thoughts? Should Jose Manuel Godinez-Samperio be allowed to practice law in the United States, and explain your thoughts.

Let the murderers live while those murdered never experienced life

Paying the death penalty for crime - garroting...

An eye for an eye. U.S. News – California voters to consider ending capital punishment.

The death penalty, some want it abolished, others want it to stay, and still others think the process to rid this earth of a disease like a murderer slowly seeps along like sap from a Maple tree. Yet righteous wackos, along with those soulless deranged criminal attorneys think that the death penalty is an unjust, cruel and inhumane way of dealing with those that take it upon themselves to end someone elses life. Hurt feelings about what was said about criminal attorneys, to bad keep reading. Apologies, but anyone who feels that a criminal should get compensation, in some form, for hurting themselves on someones property during a crime, or committing murder, should be hung and disbarred from practicing law. Shame on you for even fathom the thought that these criminals deserve any rights or liberties.

Yet digression has set in. The arguments for abolishing the death penalty are minimal at best. They claim, and I agree, that it is costing Californians millions of dollars, the other claim, and I laugh cold heartedly at this, is that it is cruel and unusual punishment and inhumane and unjust. Wait, what are you wackos smoking? Did you get your weed from the Inland Empire, San Bernardino county region or what? Why should these murderers receive anything less than a cruel and inhumane execution? These cave dwelling uneducated criminals did not spare any cruelty or humanity when they decided to brutally kill another human being.

And to touch on the other claim or should I say fact in regards to the astronomical cost of retribution that is administered for the death penalty. Why does it cost approximately 300 million tax payer dollars to convict and execute these worthless humans, for outreaching the cost to house them per year for the rest of their life ($90,000 per year)? The reason is ladies and gentlemen, is because the law allows it. We allow these criminals to perform countless appeals on their convictions, which takes up tax dollars to pay for defense attorneys, legal fees and union workers (i.e. Police, Prison Guards and state civil workers), all of this to try to overturn a conviction that originally contained enough evidence to convict the person. No apologies if this hurts any readers feelings, but if there is enough credible evidence, not to mention eye witnesses or any type of media that directly implicates someone in a crime of such a horrendous nature, then there should be no appeals what so ever; “You did the crime, the verdict has been read and your sentence will begin and your execution date is on such and such date. Next case!”

Here is a logical thought, who cares about the pain and suffering these death row inmates succumb to in the execution, they had no consideration for the pain and suffering of their victims so they are due no just respect from anyone or any legal entity. Same that 300 million dollars, but a .45 Magnum Revolver and load each chamber with a hallow point round. Stand the convict against the wall, point the revolver at their head and pull the trigger. Let us see here what this will eliminate; A bullet to the brain eliminates any pain and suffering from the instantaneous explosion of brain matter, and $299,999,750 California tax dollars are now saved from purchasing a basic hand gun. Not to mention that would save an extra $90,000 per year from having to store these useless individuals in our jail systems.

Back in Jan. 31, 2002, Chris Clem, JD, Attorney at Samples, Jennings, Ray & Clem, PLLC, stated the following:

Executions do not have to cost that much. We could hang them and re-use the rope. No cost! Or we could use firing squads and ask for volunteer firing squad members who would provide their own guns and ammunition. Again, no cost.”

Come on America, stop being so damn yellow-bellied and spineless and show criminals and those thinking of creating horrendous crimes that we are not going to tolerate it and there is a dire consequence if they do commit any such act. That is the problem with some American citizens today, they believe through their righteous self-centered ways that everyone should be shown kindness and forgiveness, but hear this, if one of these criminals performed any such action on these book thumping individuals they would be calling for the person’s head.

What are your thoughts on the death penalty? Any thoughts of why these criminals should be shown leniency and pardoned from their death sentence to a life in prison instead costing California much-needed tax dollars?