Cretinous California

Aguirre and Schwarzenegger welcome new citizen...

Aguirre and Schwarzenegger welcome new citizens 2004-01-30 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Blunt and to the point… First this goes out to you Californians, whom voted for Joker Brown, Bandit Boxer and Antonio “The Picture Taker” Villaraigosa, those that want to keep raising taxes because you believe the taxes are going to go for the “children” (Wake up dumb-asses its to pay for the teachers and their exorbitant pensions and lazy day salaries) and those that think giving hand outs to those that are too damn lazy, too drugged or drunk and are not supposed to be in this country legally, You are frigging IDIOTS!!! Yes, you are moronic boobs that should not be allowed to vote anymore, as it has been proven time and time again that your choices are the wrong choices.

Congratulations Southern States, California has now become the most backward and dumbest state of the country. Pulse Opinion Research [POR], a subsidiary of Rutgers, released a poll about the view-point on Illegal Immigration and whether or not the those leeches on US tax payers should return to their wasteland of a home country, and 52% agreed that those burdens should take a one-way trip back home. However, a similar report was performed on the citizens of California, and their results showed that 90% of us Californians should keep these freebie grabbing parasites in the country.

You are kidding me right? The majority of the country wants the bane of the population to be excused from our country, and yet California, one of the most “powerful” states in the country, has a 90% favoritism of keeping these damn pustulous cockroaches on our front steps?

As I sit here scratching my bald head, pondering the boisterous reasons that California is a shit hole, I wonder to myself… When are the citizens going to wake up and take control of this state again. Californians vote for the best candidates of course, but not the best in managing business nor finances. No sir, we (and I mean loosely, we) vote for the best candidate with criminal backgrounds, with double bankruptcy filings, with corruption scandals and keep voting these jokes of politicians into office even after years of non-productivity and money grabbing schemes. Why the high number of votes to keep the illegals here? Because there are too many ankle-grabbers in California, too many citizens that do not care about the important issues and the state of the State. No they are too consumed with either giving out benefits and tax payer dollars to those that do not deserve it or they are the ones receiving the free hand outs and god forbid they vote for anything that is right and will better the State.

Keep it up you stupid putrid excuses for US citizens of California, mark my word bankruptcy and Mariachi music is on the horizon for California.

Pshhh! I scoff at your pathetic laws

Summer's End. Lexington Green, 11 September 20...

Summer’s End. Lexington Green, 11 September 2002. Photo taken in Minute Man National Historical Park. Sculpture : “Minuteman” by sculptor Henry Hudson Kitson (1863-1947), dedicated April 19, 1900. Erected 1899 : SIRIS (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Gun Control

Those two words have run rampant in the past year and will continue, as mass shootings have taken place throughout the United States.  The individuals who are committing these heinous crimes are in pure form, criminals.

Ladies and gentlemen, criminals are the lowest forms of wasted space within our confines of the United States. They are rejected specimens of society based on their inability to function, to follow rules and to exist amongst regular members of society. And lest they refuse to obey by the laws.

With that being said, who and what gives the government any idea that by passing stricter gun laws it will help reduce the crimes of shooting someone. The President and Vice-President along with the other monkeys of congress can run their gums all they want and come up with idiotic and senseless laws that will restrict the sane gun owners from acquiring firearms. However, since criminals do not follow laws nor care if they even exist, why would the government think that these tougher laws will make it harder for these crimes to exist.

What the members of government needs is a good strong open-handed slap upside the head to wake them from their fantasy ego power trips thinking that their “tougher” laws will solve the issues. Criminals find ways to acquire the tools they need.  Since the government is too lazy to enforce the rules that are already in place and too stupid to stop coming up with clueless and treasonist acts of giving weapons to terrorists and drug lords (Fast and Furious ring a bell), the putrid existence of human flesh we call criminals will continue their onslaught of killing innocent US citizens and in essence will be backed by the government.

On a side note, Nancy Pelosi its the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution, not the 1st, you moronic pretentious plastic waste of a government chair. Sit down, shut up and let your husband make the money. You have no right to be in any office of the government.

With tougher gun control laws, comes a hidden agenda of actually controlling the US citizens and limiting their powers of freedom. Criminals in any sense of the form should have no freedoms nor existence even though they will continue to get away with murder… literally.

Thou shalt not judge. Go to Hell!!!

English: The logo of the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexua...

Religious nut? Worship an unseen being? Bible thumper? Nope not here, was once forced to plant the padded backside to a wooden pew to worship an entity that may or may not exist. Now stuck in an infinite loop of debate of what came first, the Bible or Evolution?

Knowledge is power and even though questions arise about existence, one thing is certain. Within the bible it is told that according to God, you shall not judge another human being, or something to that effect. Never the less, God said you should not judge another human being. So then why do these Bible thumping, religious self-righteous con artist evangelical preachers insist on telling his or her congregation that the gay, lesbian and transgendered society be burned and discarded as human beings. These whack jobs claim to preach the word of the lord and are doing the lords work. News flash idiots, if you really did know the word of the Lord then you would know that what you are doing is lying, and holding the lords name in vain. Thought, are these actions not against some of the 10 commandments?

Do not judge another human being if you yourself, are not perfect. And no human being is.

To be President of the United States?

Seal of the President of the United States Esp...

The ignorance and lack of basic logic in the voting population has become a front-runner for incompetence and lack of American responsibilities within the White House and State and Local governments. Most registered voters today base their decision on a variety of issues that should not be regarded as a viable candidate for placing an American citizen within the presidency role or any state or local run top office.

These decision generating issues include the following:

You get the general idea. In simplest terms, the issues that do not really matter in terms of running the United States of America efficiently and productively in satisfying the general population needs of legal citizens and American businesses.  Each election year the candidates repeat the same psycho babble that was performed the years past. Reciting repetitive soulless promises geared towards the groups that providing the most grease in the hands, playing on the needs of tax relief, the needs of religious psychotics in the bible belt, and the needs of illegal immigrants and the general childish attempts to degrade and discredit the other candidates, is like an instinctual sparrow that would never veer from the normal migration to try a new path.

In the eyes of this American citizen, the previously mentioned issues are insignificant at the least. Open your mind and the minds of those less intelligent and consider the truth that the issues of religion, government intervention, marital issues, and past political stances are an absolute detriment to an effective presidential nominee. Let’s explain why.

Think for a minute about what the United States is in its simplest yet largest form…

The United States of America has the following:

  • Assets
  • Accounts Payables/Receivables
  • Competitors
  • Departments
  • Employees
  • Hierarchy of Management
  • Rules and Regulations
  • Services and Products

If the thought of a corporation comes to mind then you are correct. The United States of America is just that, a multi-trillion dollar partnership corporation. Explaining the correlation between the United States and a corporation will be left for Q & A in the comments for those not willing or incapable of putting the defined to different aspects of the United States. Boredom for the educated and logical would set in, if a full explanation of each example was to be included. Hereinafter, the United States will be referred to as “The Corporation”.

Since this correlation exists between the two, then why do voters and presidential hopefuls so concerned about meaningless issues that do not concern The Corporation. Issues and concerns by both voters and hopefuls should be focusing on bettering state of The Corporation. This country is in a turbulent downward spiral with no way of stopping the flushing of American values, ethics and preservation of this country, unless the citizens focus on the main issues. Those issues should only centralize on making The Corporation better as a whole internally. Government intervention into everyday family, religious and sexual lives should be set aside, foreign aid and intervention should be curtailed until our own citizens get food, education and monetary welfare to better themselves, taxes across the board (including state and local taxes) should be redefined as to create a better revolving door of cash flow for not only the federal, state and local governments but as well as the working class citizens, and our belts around our borders and illegal alien activity within these borders should be brought in tightly to extinguish the welfare that the illegal aliens are receiving criminally.

By focusing on the internal core values and structure of The Corporation, The Corporation just might be able to stop the degradation of society and financial worth. With all of this being said, one of the primary requirements of running for the President of the United States should be the following:

Any and all Presidential candidates are required to have successful experience running an American corporation, while a legal natural-born United States citizen, that has shown positive gains throughout the tenure of said candidates at such corporation. Required responsibilities include but not limited to; Judicial enforcement and construction of business laws and regulations, financial appropriations not detrimental to the corporation, delegations of authorities, and instrumental increases of productivity to product or services provided.

By limiting the candidacies to only those eligible by the above requirements, it would greatly reduce the chances, in this writers opinion, of electing into office any ego-centric righteous politician or lawyer without a business background. Neither, politicians nor lawyer, to the knowledge within, have experience running a corporation efficiently nor do they have the ethics nor morals to make decisions that would benefit the corporation as a whole and disregard other corporations requests and needs in the process. Focus on The Corporation, up to its borders and inclusively all within should be top priority, all to benefit the legal citizens and The Corporation as a whole and honestly this writer does not believe neither a crooked politician nor the plague of defused American rights lawyer has the ability to do so.

The United States legal citizens need a leader that is capable of running the country, for the good of the legal citizens of the United States. What the citizens do not need in a President, is one whom deferred to the needs and requirements of foreign bodies and their opportunistic leeches of aliens, as well one whom as never had the experience of running an organization and least but most important, one whom would rather cater to the direct benefactors and leeches then to the legal citizens and internal businesses en mass within the United States.

Irony has hit this year since one of the candidates has had business experience as mentioned earlier, Mitt Romney.

Do you agree or disagree with an upgraded requirement base for running for office, on the National, State or Local stage?

The word ‘Illegal’ is racist? In what dictionary?

Shut down this site: Drop the ‘I’ Word

Such a beautiful woman, disappointing that foul words spew from those lips

Monica Novoa, this is a public notice challenge to you, to present proof of concept that the word ILLEGAL is a racist term. The following will demonstrate to you, a supposed educated woman on what a racist slur is. Let’s give you a little help to understand that each slur you will find in the following is considered racist and each is definitive of a specific race of inhabitants of this world.

*Disclaimer: The following depicts sensitive and non-PC language. I am in no way a racists, but I am a firm believer that being politically correct is for those that are afraid to stand up for themselves and what they believe in. Though the following slurs are extremely racists and can cause extreme anger in some readers, remember that the following is for explanatory purposes only.

In the beginning of American history, the Injun’s encountered the Moon Crickets. Once Whitey established themselves, they found it easier to get someone else to do the hard labor. They sent ships to Africa and China to round-up Jungle Bunnies, Knuckle-Draggers, Rail Hoppers and Coolies. The Crackers kept Pickaninnies away from normal society, which was wrong and Abraham Lincoln freed what was once coined “Lincolns Mistake.” Beach Niggers began to hear their slave boys use a term to refer to each other intimately just between their own race, but Whitey wanted to be Wiggers and typical Honkies, so they adapted to calling the blacks Niggers as well. Even early in history there were Chocolate Dippers and Powder Fuckers producing Oreos and Urban Zebras

Later in history, Guerro’s battled the Spic’s, and for retribution from the loss to the US, the Wetbacks, Scratchbacks and Chili-Shitters began to cross into the US, legally of course. A few more battles between the US and other nations, involved the Yankees against the Nips, Charlies, Gooks, and Japs. Another war, but for the masses with the Boxheads or Nazis if you will, being their natural Jew-Killer selves, executing most likely the largest destruction of a race ever the Bagel-Dog, Hooknose Jews. This war culminated into a conglomerate of multi-races fighting such as the Red Pinko Commies, Tommy Tea Bag Brits, Dago Zip Grape Stompers and Chink Cookies.

After the major wars, life resumed in the US for the Rednecks and White Trash and their Ditchpigs living side by side with the Ghetto Brothers and Nappy-headed Hoes (courtesy of Don Imus) with their Ghetto Hamsters. Slowly the Beaner Taco Bender population began to grow rapidly with the Wetbacks and Scratchbacks making a run for the border in an attempt to perform in the Border Hopper olympics. This gave rise to more Oreos and zebras. Then the Yellow Zipperhead Slanteyes began immigrating making fun of the Roundeyes as they saw them walking the streets. Soon the US had become a melting pot, with Cab Niggers, Camel Jockies, Towel-heads and Flips and Gwats rushing in like water from the New Orleans Damn that broke.

All that is said and done, those Diaper headed Sand Niggers caused pandemonium and chaos for the US by killing thousands of Honkies, Niggers, Beaners, Jews, Zips, Chinks, Guidos and the like, even their own Fig Gobblers. For once in the history of the US, Whitey, Brothers, Spics, Kikes, Chinos, Yokos and Camel Cowboys united as one nation to rebuild and become stronger. The difference between these races and some of the Knuckle-Draggers, Wetbacks, Jews, Gooks and Sand-Niggers coming today… The unity was of LEGAL patriotic US citizens who pride themselves in loving this country and abiding and assimilating into the culture and laws. Unlike the ILLEGAL aliens, who come to this country, show patriotism not for the US but for their homeland (want proof, watch which flags rise up during marches and demonstrations), they do not assimilate and do not abide by the rules of the US, therefore they are breaking the law which is… ILLEGAL.

Understanding the term “racist slur” means comprehending the term “race.” All of the preceding slurs referred to a specific race, or common denominator physical characteristic of each group of people. The attempt within the stated website and Monica Novoa, and by the supportive derelict enemies of the United States is to essentially de-criminalize illegal aliens by taking out the word ILLEGAL. You may call it what you will;

but these cancerous parasites coming into this country ILLEGALLY are breaking the law, therefore they are performing an ILLEGAL act and since the governmental definition of an alien is any foreign person entering the US that is not a citizen, they are essentially ILLEGAL ALIENS. If you want to change the name, then lets come up with more precise terminology for these infesting law-breaking cretins such as;

  • Criminal Aliens/Immigrants
  • Crooked Aliens/Immigrants
  • Lawless Aliens/Immigrants
  • Undesirable Aliens/Immigrants
  • Unwanted Aliens/Immigrants

A quick look at one of the “terms” that this self-proclaimed “educated” woman, Monica Novoa, coined, NAFTA refugees. Are you not aware what NAFTA stands for, let alone what a refugee is? In case you were asleep during lectures in your useless path to an English degree let us refresh your memory.

NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Act which essentially lifted all non-tariff boundaries between Canada, North American and Mexico and eliminated most trade tariffs between the three countries immediately.

A refugee is an individual fleeing from some type of danger or political persecution. or one seeking asylum (most if not all the time from a country)

So logically let us get this correct Monica Novoa, you are basically telling the United States and its media by using the term of “NAFTA Refugee,” that these ILLEGAL aliens are seeking asylum in the United States from a trade agreement?

This fight and your explanation for removing the “I” word or “ILLEGAL” is baseless on the pure evidence that regardless of any means to “humanize” these ILLEGAL aliens, is still calling them ILLEGAL aliens, since what they are doing is illegal. By dropping this attempt at of mass asylum for ILLEGAL aliens, you will essentially save face from the American citizens whom have seen their rights taken away, and their liberties and freedoms givien away to those undeserving of such special treatment.

Interested parties of this article, how would you vote on this if it was put on the November ballot and why?

Why are criminals fighting to be laywers?

U.S. News – Can an illegal immigrant become a lawyer?.

Jose Manuel Godinez-Samperi

Political correctness is disregarded herein after. Why is it that Florida, the geriatric, capital of the US is the host of some of the most insane occurrences in the United States? They had

Casey Anthony, the murderer of her young daughter (Yes she murdered her daughter, I said it so what), then they have the Trayvon Martin case who was murdered in cold-blood by a wanna be cop (George Zimmerman) who is using the most insanely idiotic law of self-preservation I have ever heard (Stand your ground) and now an illegal immigrant, Jose Manuel Godinez-Samperio, mind you whom is breaking the law, is fighting to become a lawyer in the United States.

Oddly enough as it seems, that an illegal wants to become a lawyer and uphold the law of the land, that of which he is clearly breaking, the screwed up rotting brains of the decrepid geezers of the Florida Supreme Court are actually going to look into whether or not this illegal has the right to practice law in the US. Hey old gas-passers, here is the quick answer for you, “No, he is breaking the law already, so how can someone who is breaking the law be capable of defending the law.” Who cares if he was brought here by his illegal alien parents, he is still an illegal and should have no rights to become a lawyer, let alone should have been allowed to go to schools, get a law degree in an US university (without a green card or visa) and should definitely not be living here.

If this illegal scum wins his case, can you just imagine the consequences it would have on the legal system and the floodgates of illegals thinking they can sue to work here, get free aid and do what they please, all while breaking the law. This piece of Mexican trash is going to do one thing and one thing only if he wins, and that is fight and tie up the legal systems with frivolous lawsuits for illegal immigrants. I would say that any other state would look at his claim and laugh it off and tell him to leave. Oh contraire, where I live (The good ol’ safe haven for illegal aliens, California) the idiots in our Supreme Court would not only consider it, but also take him to lunch, wine and dine and find out what more he desires. Then Tony Villar (that is the male form of the name of LA Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa) would take him on the Long Beach Yacht that is wasting tax payers dollars (yes it is a yacht you illiterate dumbo-eared poor excuse for a mayor), and offer him a key to the city along with all of the free perks he desires. So Florida and California in this writers opinions are the worse places to be an American citizen, because here, the illegal pieces of trash from Mexico and any other degenerated country have more rights in these two states then naturally born citizens.

How can someone who is breaking the law even be considered for a law practice in the United States, if they are breaking the law already? Isn’t that like giving a bank robber a job at the National Treasury? Why can they be trusted to uphold law-abiding employment and trust when they are criminals.

What are your thoughts? Should Jose Manuel Godinez-Samperio be allowed to practice law in the United States, and explain your thoughts.

Let the murderers live while those murdered never experienced life

Paying the death penalty for crime - garroting...

An eye for an eye. U.S. News – California voters to consider ending capital punishment.

The death penalty, some want it abolished, others want it to stay, and still others think the process to rid this earth of a disease like a murderer slowly seeps along like sap from a Maple tree. Yet righteous wackos, along with those soulless deranged criminal attorneys think that the death penalty is an unjust, cruel and inhumane way of dealing with those that take it upon themselves to end someone elses life. Hurt feelings about what was said about criminal attorneys, to bad keep reading. Apologies, but anyone who feels that a criminal should get compensation, in some form, for hurting themselves on someones property during a crime, or committing murder, should be hung and disbarred from practicing law. Shame on you for even fathom the thought that these criminals deserve any rights or liberties.

Yet digression has set in. The arguments for abolishing the death penalty are minimal at best. They claim, and I agree, that it is costing Californians millions of dollars, the other claim, and I laugh cold heartedly at this, is that it is cruel and unusual punishment and inhumane and unjust. Wait, what are you wackos smoking? Did you get your weed from the Inland Empire, San Bernardino county region or what? Why should these murderers receive anything less than a cruel and inhumane execution? These cave dwelling uneducated criminals did not spare any cruelty or humanity when they decided to brutally kill another human being.

And to touch on the other claim or should I say fact in regards to the astronomical cost of retribution that is administered for the death penalty. Why does it cost approximately 300 million tax payer dollars to convict and execute these worthless humans, for outreaching the cost to house them per year for the rest of their life ($90,000 per year)? The reason is ladies and gentlemen, is because the law allows it. We allow these criminals to perform countless appeals on their convictions, which takes up tax dollars to pay for defense attorneys, legal fees and union workers (i.e. Police, Prison Guards and state civil workers), all of this to try to overturn a conviction that originally contained enough evidence to convict the person. No apologies if this hurts any readers feelings, but if there is enough credible evidence, not to mention eye witnesses or any type of media that directly implicates someone in a crime of such a horrendous nature, then there should be no appeals what so ever; “You did the crime, the verdict has been read and your sentence will begin and your execution date is on such and such date. Next case!”

Here is a logical thought, who cares about the pain and suffering these death row inmates succumb to in the execution, they had no consideration for the pain and suffering of their victims so they are due no just respect from anyone or any legal entity. Same that 300 million dollars, but a .45 Magnum Revolver and load each chamber with a hallow point round. Stand the convict against the wall, point the revolver at their head and pull the trigger. Let us see here what this will eliminate; A bullet to the brain eliminates any pain and suffering from the instantaneous explosion of brain matter, and $299,999,750 California tax dollars are now saved from purchasing a basic hand gun. Not to mention that would save an extra $90,000 per year from having to store these useless individuals in our jail systems.

Back in Jan. 31, 2002, Chris Clem, JD, Attorney at Samples, Jennings, Ray & Clem, PLLC, stated the following:

Executions do not have to cost that much. We could hang them and re-use the rope. No cost! Or we could use firing squads and ask for volunteer firing squad members who would provide their own guns and ammunition. Again, no cost.”

Come on America, stop being so damn yellow-bellied and spineless and show criminals and those thinking of creating horrendous crimes that we are not going to tolerate it and there is a dire consequence if they do commit any such act. That is the problem with some American citizens today, they believe through their righteous self-centered ways that everyone should be shown kindness and forgiveness, but hear this, if one of these criminals performed any such action on these book thumping individuals they would be calling for the person’s head.

What are your thoughts on the death penalty? Any thoughts of why these criminals should be shown leniency and pardoned from their death sentence to a life in prison instead costing California much-needed tax dollars?