To be President of the United States?

Seal of the President of the United States Esp...

The ignorance and lack of basic logic in the voting population has become a front-runner for incompetence and lack of American responsibilities within the White House and State and Local governments. Most registered voters today base their decision on a variety of issues that should not be regarded as a viable candidate for placing an American citizen within the presidency role or any state or local run top office.

These decision generating issues include the following:

You get the general idea. In simplest terms, the issues that do not really matter in terms of running the United States of America efficiently and productively in satisfying the general population needs of legal citizens and American businesses.  Each election year the candidates repeat the same psycho babble that was performed the years past. Reciting repetitive soulless promises geared towards the groups that providing the most grease in the hands, playing on the needs of tax relief, the needs of religious psychotics in the bible belt, and the needs of illegal immigrants and the general childish attempts to degrade and discredit the other candidates, is like an instinctual sparrow that would never veer from the normal migration to try a new path.

In the eyes of this American citizen, the previously mentioned issues are insignificant at the least. Open your mind and the minds of those less intelligent and consider the truth that the issues of religion, government intervention, marital issues, and past political stances are an absolute detriment to an effective presidential nominee. Let’s explain why.

Think for a minute about what the United States is in its simplest yet largest form…

The United States of America has the following:

  • Assets
  • Accounts Payables/Receivables
  • Competitors
  • Departments
  • Employees
  • Hierarchy of Management
  • Rules and Regulations
  • Services and Products

If the thought of a corporation comes to mind then you are correct. The United States of America is just that, a multi-trillion dollar partnership corporation. Explaining the correlation between the United States and a corporation will be left for Q & A in the comments for those not willing or incapable of putting the defined to different aspects of the United States. Boredom for the educated and logical would set in, if a full explanation of each example was to be included. Hereinafter, the United States will be referred to as “The Corporation”.

Since this correlation exists between the two, then why do voters and presidential hopefuls so concerned about meaningless issues that do not concern The Corporation. Issues and concerns by both voters and hopefuls should be focusing on bettering state of The Corporation. This country is in a turbulent downward spiral with no way of stopping the flushing of American values, ethics and preservation of this country, unless the citizens focus on the main issues. Those issues should only centralize on making The Corporation better as a whole internally. Government intervention into everyday family, religious and sexual lives should be set aside, foreign aid and intervention should be curtailed until our own citizens get food, education and monetary welfare to better themselves, taxes across the board (including state and local taxes) should be redefined as to create a better revolving door of cash flow for not only the federal, state and local governments but as well as the working class citizens, and our belts around our borders and illegal alien activity within these borders should be brought in tightly to extinguish the welfare that the illegal aliens are receiving criminally.

By focusing on the internal core values and structure of The Corporation, The Corporation just might be able to stop the degradation of society and financial worth. With all of this being said, one of the primary requirements of running for the President of the United States should be the following:

Any and all Presidential candidates are required to have successful experience running an American corporation, while a legal natural-born United States citizen, that has shown positive gains throughout the tenure of said candidates at such corporation. Required responsibilities include but not limited to; Judicial enforcement and construction of business laws and regulations, financial appropriations not detrimental to the corporation, delegations of authorities, and instrumental increases of productivity to product or services provided.

By limiting the candidacies to only those eligible by the above requirements, it would greatly reduce the chances, in this writers opinion, of electing into office any ego-centric righteous politician or lawyer without a business background. Neither, politicians nor lawyer, to the knowledge within, have experience running a corporation efficiently nor do they have the ethics nor morals to make decisions that would benefit the corporation as a whole and disregard other corporations requests and needs in the process. Focus on The Corporation, up to its borders and inclusively all within should be top priority, all to benefit the legal citizens and The Corporation as a whole and honestly this writer does not believe neither a crooked politician nor the plague of defused American rights lawyer has the ability to do so.

The United States legal citizens need a leader that is capable of running the country, for the good of the legal citizens of the United States. What the citizens do not need in a President, is one whom deferred to the needs and requirements of foreign bodies and their opportunistic leeches of aliens, as well one whom as never had the experience of running an organization and least but most important, one whom would rather cater to the direct benefactors and leeches then to the legal citizens and internal businesses en mass within the United States.

Irony has hit this year since one of the candidates has had business experience as mentioned earlier, Mitt Romney.

Do you agree or disagree with an upgraded requirement base for running for office, on the National, State or Local stage?

PETA’s bid to free SeaWorld orcas may not get far – latimes.com

Orca show at Sea World San Diego

Did I miss a jump in evolutionary theory or something: PETA’s bid to free Sea World orcas may not get far – latimes.com.

Call it ignorance or what may you, but to my knowledge the vast majority of PETA loonies are vegetarians or vegans. And from those kind I have personally known, they seem to be a little off their rocker. I presume the lack of true proteins from beef, poultry, fish and milk by products has corrupted the brains and intelligence of PETA participants. I am a proud member of PETA 2.0 (People for Eating Tasty Animals).

PETA is claiming that killer whales are in direct correspondence with the description of the 13th Amendment, claiming that animals are considered people and that they should not be held for slave labor to Sea World. Who cares if they are well fed, live in a clean water world environment away from the waste and sewage that plagues the oceans today.

13th Amendment: (Wikipedia)

Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Definitions of conditions: (Wikipedia)

Peonage[14]

Refers to a person in “debt servitude,” or involuntary servitude tied to the payment of a debt. Compulsion to servitude includes the use of force, the threat of force, or the threat of legal coercion to compel a person to work against his or her will.

Involuntary servitude[15]

Refers to a person held by actual force, threats of force, or threats of legal coercion in a condition of slavery – compulsory service or labor against his or her will. This also includes the condition in which people are compelled to work against their will by a “climate of fear” evoked by the use of force, the threat of force, or the threat of legal coercion (i.e., suffer legal consequences unless compliant with demands made upon them) which is sufficient to compel service against a person’s will. The first U.S. Supreme Court case to uphold the ban against involuntary servitude was Bailey v. Alabama(1911).

Requiring specific performance as a remedy for breach of personal services contracts has been understood to be a form of involuntary servitude.[16]

Forced labor[17]Labor or service obtained by:

  • threats of serious harm or physical restraint;
  • any scheme, plan, or pattern intended to cause a person to believe they would suffer serious harm or physical restraint if they did not perform such labor or services:
  • the abuse or threatened abuse of law or the legal process.

So tell me where in there does it state that a person is classified as any living being, not just the 2 legged type?

It is ironic that PETA is for the ethical and humane treatment of animals, yet are fighting to get trained and dependent orcas released into the wild where they would most likely starve, since they are used to having their food hand delivered to them. Would it be more unethical to release these mammals into the wild to fend for themselves and almost certain demise, then to keep them in a safe environment where there is an abundance of food, clean water and a staff and veterinarians that care for them and their well being? That is like having a family pet dog with you for 5 years then kicking him out of the house to fend for himself on the streets.

The residing judge in this case had the foresight to know what would happen if this lawsuit goes to trial, and hopefully he does the right thing by dismissing the case before it gets into court. Because, if this does get to court, a flood gate would open allowing for numerous other lawsuits to be filed against zoos, policy and military K-9 units and quite possibly even family pets.

PETA members you have more important things to do, like go after poachers and the foreign countries that kill dogs and cats by the hundreds each day for human consumption. While you are at please eat at least the protein from animal meats that are humanly slaughtered to build up the brain power to increase your double digit IQ’s so you will learn what the difference is between a “person” and an “animal”.

Milking mammary mayhem at Target

English: WPA poster promoting breast feeding a...

Image via Wikipedia

Now this is a true meaning of Freedom of Expression: TODAYMoms – Got milk? Target does! Readers share stories from the Target nurse-in.

I cannot believe that there are people who are still so anal retentive conservative prudes. Feeding ones child is a natural human thing to do and yet we still have individuals who think that a momma’s mammaries should be kept under wraps regardless if her screaming child is hungry or not. These are the same individuals who believe that the Statue of David is repulsive and should be destroyed because it shows his penis. That is art people, and breast-feeding a child is nature; two things that you cannot stop.

As for me, I say all you moms with breast-feeding babies in the world, feel free to breast feed any time and any place. But on one condition, if you believe people should not be offended by you breast-feeding your child in public, then you should not be offended by a man trying to catch a glimpse or staring even at the site of your heavy milk engorged jugs. Both are natural things humans do, woman need to feed their babies and men have a deep recessive need to look at beautiful plump breasts. Regardless of the sexual nature I am conjuring up here, I still applaud these women for what they did and will still continue to do and that is being a mother to a child, one of the hardest jobs in the world.

Maher witnessed Tebow Jesusless on eve of his birth

Bill Maher - Caricature

My point exactly: Comedian Bill Maher creates firestorm with profane tweet about Denver Broncos QB Tim Tebow – NFL News | FOX Sports on MSN.

This article could not come at a more perfect time for me, right after my last blog for 2012 New Year’s Resolutions for America and its’ citizens in regards of freedom of speech.

It’s the latest craze! Move over planking, owling and horsemaning (or whatever you call it), here comes Tebowing! The stupid phenomenon where Tim Tebow honestly thinks that his savior Jesus Christ helped him throw a touchdown or run the ball into the end zone. I am somewhat religious, but in no way shape or form do I believe for one iota of a second that Jesus took time out of his busy day to come down and hold Tebows’ hand and help him throw a TD pass to a receiver that knows or believes that Tebow through the ball and the receiver used HIS hands to catch the ball and run it in for a TD. Or that Jesus put his feet into Tebows’ feet and ran for some huge yardage into the end zone. I have been watching football, well ever since I can remember liking football, 30 some odd years, and I have never seen a more commercialized action of praising another entity in winning at something, then I have with Tim Tebow.

Bill Maher, an atheist, was purely poking fun of the belief that an unseen entity can be the sole reason someone failed at something. And, if you read between the lines he is stating the obvious that since Tim Tebow did not perform to his magical super ways, does that mean Tebow blamed the devil for his misfortune? No Tebow did not. Why is it that when someone does great they thank Jesus Christ for it, but when they fail you do not hear a word about Jesus Christ whatsoever. And now Christians, I am sorry in my belief one of the worst religious organizations there is (because there are some crazy ass Christians, mostly born again) is calling for a boycott of the Bill Maher show. Excuse me this is America, Bill Maher has every right to say what he wants about a religious entity. For one, he is atheist, he does not believe in God or Jesus Christ, and two he has the freedom to give his opinion on his views. Whats next, do you want him to apologize for what he said, if so shame on you for expecting him to do so. What Bill Maher did was not blasphemy if he doesn’t believe in god or jesus christ you idiots.

Oh and by the way, you wacky Christians you, think about this, you are calling for a boycott of someone who has a cable network show and speaks his mind. Do you think for a second that everyone in America is going to suddenly turn their backs on his show? Hell fucking no, you just gave a very good reason for more people to tune in and hear what he has to say, so HBO should be thanking you all and expecting a huge increase in viewership soon.

2012 New Year’s Resolutions – #4 Reinstate the true meaning of freedom

Reinstate the true meaning of freedom

Every day, a soldier is either fighting or dying for it. Every day, the government preaches to us that without these wars we would not have it. It seems however, that everywhere you turn someone or some group is trying to take it away. This entity I am speaking of is our freedoms. One in particular that I want to emphasize is the Freedom of Speech, the First Amendment to the Constitution.

Sure we have the freedom to speak our mind, as long as no one person, culture, religion or other country gets hurts in the process. Society today has become too sensitive to opinions and language. I say, “Screw that bull fucking shit you sensitive fucking pussies!” Instead of evolving and realizing that we are a strong society, we are reverting back to ye ol’ English days of pompous anal retentive fruits that do not know how to take criticism or allow people or businesses to make choices that better themselves. Government has allowed Consumer Groups (FCC) to monitor the lives of its’ citizens to the point where newspapers are limited on what they can print and print from readers, Continue reading

Support America – Shop at Lowe’s

A typical Lowe's storefront in Santa Clara, Ca...

Reference: Backlash for Lowe’s as ads pulled from Muslim show – Local News – Charlotte, NC – msnbc.com.

Really? When has it become wrong for a company to pull advertising or direct their advertising to their proper target demographics? Lowe’s pulled their ads from a TLC show called “All-American Muslims” due to complaints from true Americans. Unfortunately here in California, there is an idiot who wants to boycott Lowe’s for redirecting their advertising to another target demographic. And this idiot is an immigrant and running for State Senate. Continue reading