To be President of the United States?

Seal of the President of the United States Esp...

The ignorance and lack of basic logic in the voting population has become a front-runner for incompetence and lack of American responsibilities within the White House and State and Local governments. Most registered voters today base their decision on a variety of issues that should not be regarded as a viable candidate for placing an American citizen within the presidency role or any state or local run top office.

These decision generating issues include the following:

You get the general idea. In simplest terms, the issues that do not really matter in terms of running the United States of America efficiently and productively in satisfying the general population needs of legal citizens and American businesses.  Each election year the candidates repeat the same psycho babble that was performed the years past. Reciting repetitive soulless promises geared towards the groups that providing the most grease in the hands, playing on the needs of tax relief, the needs of religious psychotics in the bible belt, and the needs of illegal immigrants and the general childish attempts to degrade and discredit the other candidates, is like an instinctual sparrow that would never veer from the normal migration to try a new path.

In the eyes of this American citizen, the previously mentioned issues are insignificant at the least. Open your mind and the minds of those less intelligent and consider the truth that the issues of religion, government intervention, marital issues, and past political stances are an absolute detriment to an effective presidential nominee. Let’s explain why.

Think for a minute about what the United States is in its simplest yet largest form…

The United States of America has the following:

  • Assets
  • Accounts Payables/Receivables
  • Competitors
  • Departments
  • Employees
  • Hierarchy of Management
  • Rules and Regulations
  • Services and Products

If the thought of a corporation comes to mind then you are correct. The United States of America is just that, a multi-trillion dollar partnership corporation. Explaining the correlation between the United States and a corporation will be left for Q & A in the comments for those not willing or incapable of putting the defined to different aspects of the United States. Boredom for the educated and logical would set in, if a full explanation of each example was to be included. Hereinafter, the United States will be referred to as “The Corporation”.

Since this correlation exists between the two, then why do voters and presidential hopefuls so concerned about meaningless issues that do not concern The Corporation. Issues and concerns by both voters and hopefuls should be focusing on bettering state of The Corporation. This country is in a turbulent downward spiral with no way of stopping the flushing of American values, ethics and preservation of this country, unless the citizens focus on the main issues. Those issues should only centralize on making The Corporation better as a whole internally. Government intervention into everyday family, religious and sexual lives should be set aside, foreign aid and intervention should be curtailed until our own citizens get food, education and monetary welfare to better themselves, taxes across the board (including state and local taxes) should be redefined as to create a better revolving door of cash flow for not only the federal, state and local governments but as well as the working class citizens, and our belts around our borders and illegal alien activity within these borders should be brought in tightly to extinguish the welfare that the illegal aliens are receiving criminally.

By focusing on the internal core values and structure of The Corporation, The Corporation just might be able to stop the degradation of society and financial worth. With all of this being said, one of the primary requirements of running for the President of the United States should be the following:

Any and all Presidential candidates are required to have successful experience running an American corporation, while a legal natural-born United States citizen, that has shown positive gains throughout the tenure of said candidates at such corporation. Required responsibilities include but not limited to; Judicial enforcement and construction of business laws and regulations, financial appropriations not detrimental to the corporation, delegations of authorities, and instrumental increases of productivity to product or services provided.

By limiting the candidacies to only those eligible by the above requirements, it would greatly reduce the chances, in this writers opinion, of electing into office any ego-centric righteous politician or lawyer without a business background. Neither, politicians nor lawyer, to the knowledge within, have experience running a corporation efficiently nor do they have the ethics nor morals to make decisions that would benefit the corporation as a whole and disregard other corporations requests and needs in the process. Focus on The Corporation, up to its borders and inclusively all within should be top priority, all to benefit the legal citizens and The Corporation as a whole and honestly this writer does not believe neither a crooked politician nor the plague of defused American rights lawyer has the ability to do so.

The United States legal citizens need a leader that is capable of running the country, for the good of the legal citizens of the United States. What the citizens do not need in a President, is one whom deferred to the needs and requirements of foreign bodies and their opportunistic leeches of aliens, as well one whom as never had the experience of running an organization and least but most important, one whom would rather cater to the direct benefactors and leeches then to the legal citizens and internal businesses en mass within the United States.

Irony has hit this year since one of the candidates has had business experience as mentioned earlier, Mitt Romney.

Do you agree or disagree with an upgraded requirement base for running for office, on the National, State or Local stage?

The word ‘Illegal’ is racist? In what dictionary?

Shut down this site: Drop the ‘I’ Word

Such a beautiful woman, disappointing that foul words spew from those lips

Monica Novoa, this is a public notice challenge to you, to present proof of concept that the word ILLEGAL is a racist term. The following will demonstrate to you, a supposed educated woman on what a racist slur is. Let’s give you a little help to understand that each slur you will find in the following is considered racist and each is definitive of a specific race of inhabitants of this world.

*Disclaimer: The following depicts sensitive and non-PC language. I am in no way a racists, but I am a firm believer that being politically correct is for those that are afraid to stand up for themselves and what they believe in. Though the following slurs are extremely racists and can cause extreme anger in some readers, remember that the following is for explanatory purposes only.

In the beginning of American history, the Injun’s encountered the Moon Crickets. Once Whitey established themselves, they found it easier to get someone else to do the hard labor. They sent ships to Africa and China to round-up Jungle Bunnies, Knuckle-Draggers, Rail Hoppers and Coolies. The Crackers kept Pickaninnies away from normal society, which was wrong and Abraham Lincoln freed what was once coined “Lincolns Mistake.” Beach Niggers began to hear their slave boys use a term to refer to each other intimately just between their own race, but Whitey wanted to be Wiggers and typical Honkies, so they adapted to calling the blacks Niggers as well. Even early in history there were Chocolate Dippers and Powder Fuckers producing Oreos and Urban Zebras

Later in history, Guerro’s battled the Spic’s, and for retribution from the loss to the US, the Wetbacks, Scratchbacks and Chili-Shitters began to cross into the US, legally of course. A few more battles between the US and other nations, involved the Yankees against the Nips, Charlies, Gooks, and Japs. Another war, but for the masses with the Boxheads or Nazis if you will, being their natural Jew-Killer selves, executing most likely the largest destruction of a race ever the Bagel-Dog, Hooknose Jews. This war culminated into a conglomerate of multi-races fighting such as the Red Pinko Commies, Tommy Tea Bag Brits, Dago Zip Grape Stompers and Chink Cookies.

After the major wars, life resumed in the US for the Rednecks and White Trash and their Ditchpigs living side by side with the Ghetto Brothers and Nappy-headed Hoes (courtesy of Don Imus) with their Ghetto Hamsters. Slowly the Beaner Taco Bender population began to grow rapidly with the Wetbacks and Scratchbacks making a run for the border in an attempt to perform in the Border Hopper olympics. This gave rise to more Oreos and zebras. Then the Yellow Zipperhead Slanteyes began immigrating making fun of the Roundeyes as they saw them walking the streets. Soon the US had become a melting pot, with Cab Niggers, Camel Jockies, Towel-heads and Flips and Gwats rushing in like water from the New Orleans Damn that broke.

All that is said and done, those Diaper headed Sand Niggers caused pandemonium and chaos for the US by killing thousands of Honkies, Niggers, Beaners, Jews, Zips, Chinks, Guidos and the like, even their own Fig Gobblers. For once in the history of the US, Whitey, Brothers, Spics, Kikes, Chinos, Yokos and Camel Cowboys united as one nation to rebuild and become stronger. The difference between these races and some of the Knuckle-Draggers, Wetbacks, Jews, Gooks and Sand-Niggers coming today… The unity was of LEGAL patriotic US citizens who pride themselves in loving this country and abiding and assimilating into the culture and laws. Unlike the ILLEGAL aliens, who come to this country, show patriotism not for the US but for their homeland (want proof, watch which flags rise up during marches and demonstrations), they do not assimilate and do not abide by the rules of the US, therefore they are breaking the law which is… ILLEGAL.

Understanding the term “racist slur” means comprehending the term “race.” All of the preceding slurs referred to a specific race, or common denominator physical characteristic of each group of people. The attempt within the stated website and Monica Novoa, and by the supportive derelict enemies of the United States is to essentially de-criminalize illegal aliens by taking out the word ILLEGAL. You may call it what you will;

but these cancerous parasites coming into this country ILLEGALLY are breaking the law, therefore they are performing an ILLEGAL act and since the governmental definition of an alien is any foreign person entering the US that is not a citizen, they are essentially ILLEGAL ALIENS. If you want to change the name, then lets come up with more precise terminology for these infesting law-breaking cretins such as;

  • Criminal Aliens/Immigrants
  • Crooked Aliens/Immigrants
  • Lawless Aliens/Immigrants
  • Undesirable Aliens/Immigrants
  • Unwanted Aliens/Immigrants

A quick look at one of the “terms” that this self-proclaimed “educated” woman, Monica Novoa, coined, NAFTA refugees. Are you not aware what NAFTA stands for, let alone what a refugee is? In case you were asleep during lectures in your useless path to an English degree let us refresh your memory.

NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Act which essentially lifted all non-tariff boundaries between Canada, North American and Mexico and eliminated most trade tariffs between the three countries immediately.

A refugee is an individual fleeing from some type of danger or political persecution. or one seeking asylum (most if not all the time from a country)

So logically let us get this correct Monica Novoa, you are basically telling the United States and its media by using the term of “NAFTA Refugee,” that these ILLEGAL aliens are seeking asylum in the United States from a trade agreement?

This fight and your explanation for removing the “I” word or “ILLEGAL” is baseless on the pure evidence that regardless of any means to “humanize” these ILLEGAL aliens, is still calling them ILLEGAL aliens, since what they are doing is illegal. By dropping this attempt at of mass asylum for ILLEGAL aliens, you will essentially save face from the American citizens whom have seen their rights taken away, and their liberties and freedoms givien away to those undeserving of such special treatment.

Interested parties of this article, how would you vote on this if it was put on the November ballot and why?

Do you think US courts should allow the use of other countries laws?

Colorized image of US President Theodore Roose...

Image via Wikipedia

Let’s just bow down to Islam and hand over our country: Appeals court affirms order blocking Oklahoma sharia law ban – latimes.com.

I am not sure if my comprehension of what this article is implying, but when the hell did it become expected for the United States court of law, to honor and take into consideration the laws of other countries. Anyone who believes that the United States should consider the law of another land during a court hearing should be either slapped upside the head and explained in length that this is the United States of America, or kicked out of the country for refusing to follow our laws and our legal system.  We have our own laws and own regulations, we do not bring together law and religion and we do not, nor will not honor or consider any other nations law. How dare these Muslims come to our country and expect us to consider the law of their land. Last time I checked, they were living in our country, therefore they must respect our laws and our constitution and should not expect the laws of their land to apply to any legal matters they will deal with in the United States justice system. Newsflash Muslims, anti-sharia laws are not unconstitutional, since this is the United States of America, the laws that are governed through sharia do not apply within any court of law within our borders.  If you don’t agree with that then, oh well that is not our problem.  I guess you will have to deal with our laws Continue reading

Milking mammary mayhem at Target

English: WPA poster promoting breast feeding a...

Image via Wikipedia

Now this is a true meaning of Freedom of Expression: TODAYMoms – Got milk? Target does! Readers share stories from the Target nurse-in.

I cannot believe that there are people who are still so anal retentive conservative prudes. Feeding ones child is a natural human thing to do and yet we still have individuals who think that a momma’s mammaries should be kept under wraps regardless if her screaming child is hungry or not. These are the same individuals who believe that the Statue of David is repulsive and should be destroyed because it shows his penis. That is art people, and breast-feeding a child is nature; two things that you cannot stop.

As for me, I say all you moms with breast-feeding babies in the world, feel free to breast feed any time and any place. But on one condition, if you believe people should not be offended by you breast-feeding your child in public, then you should not be offended by a man trying to catch a glimpse or staring even at the site of your heavy milk engorged jugs. Both are natural things humans do, woman need to feed their babies and men have a deep recessive need to look at beautiful plump breasts. Regardless of the sexual nature I am conjuring up here, I still applaud these women for what they did and will still continue to do and that is being a mother to a child, one of the hardest jobs in the world.

Maher witnessed Tebow Jesusless on eve of his birth

Bill Maher - Caricature

My point exactly: Comedian Bill Maher creates firestorm with profane tweet about Denver Broncos QB Tim Tebow – NFL News | FOX Sports on MSN.

This article could not come at a more perfect time for me, right after my last blog for 2012 New Year’s Resolutions for America and its’ citizens in regards of freedom of speech.

It’s the latest craze! Move over planking, owling and horsemaning (or whatever you call it), here comes Tebowing! The stupid phenomenon where Tim Tebow honestly thinks that his savior Jesus Christ helped him throw a touchdown or run the ball into the end zone. I am somewhat religious, but in no way shape or form do I believe for one iota of a second that Jesus took time out of his busy day to come down and hold Tebows’ hand and help him throw a TD pass to a receiver that knows or believes that Tebow through the ball and the receiver used HIS hands to catch the ball and run it in for a TD. Or that Jesus put his feet into Tebows’ feet and ran for some huge yardage into the end zone. I have been watching football, well ever since I can remember liking football, 30 some odd years, and I have never seen a more commercialized action of praising another entity in winning at something, then I have with Tim Tebow.

Bill Maher, an atheist, was purely poking fun of the belief that an unseen entity can be the sole reason someone failed at something. And, if you read between the lines he is stating the obvious that since Tim Tebow did not perform to his magical super ways, does that mean Tebow blamed the devil for his misfortune? No Tebow did not. Why is it that when someone does great they thank Jesus Christ for it, but when they fail you do not hear a word about Jesus Christ whatsoever. And now Christians, I am sorry in my belief one of the worst religious organizations there is (because there are some crazy ass Christians, mostly born again) is calling for a boycott of the Bill Maher show. Excuse me this is America, Bill Maher has every right to say what he wants about a religious entity. For one, he is atheist, he does not believe in God or Jesus Christ, and two he has the freedom to give his opinion on his views. Whats next, do you want him to apologize for what he said, if so shame on you for expecting him to do so. What Bill Maher did was not blasphemy if he doesn’t believe in god or jesus christ you idiots.

Oh and by the way, you wacky Christians you, think about this, you are calling for a boycott of someone who has a cable network show and speaks his mind. Do you think for a second that everyone in America is going to suddenly turn their backs on his show? Hell fucking no, you just gave a very good reason for more people to tune in and hear what he has to say, so HBO should be thanking you all and expecting a huge increase in viewership soon.

2012 New Year’s Resolutions – #4 Reinstate the true meaning of freedom

Reinstate the true meaning of freedom

Every day, a soldier is either fighting or dying for it. Every day, the government preaches to us that without these wars we would not have it. It seems however, that everywhere you turn someone or some group is trying to take it away. This entity I am speaking of is our freedoms. One in particular that I want to emphasize is the Freedom of Speech, the First Amendment to the Constitution.

Sure we have the freedom to speak our mind, as long as no one person, culture, religion or other country gets hurts in the process. Society today has become too sensitive to opinions and language. I say, “Screw that bull fucking shit you sensitive fucking pussies!” Instead of evolving and realizing that we are a strong society, we are reverting back to ye ol’ English days of pompous anal retentive fruits that do not know how to take criticism or allow people or businesses to make choices that better themselves. Government has allowed Consumer Groups (FCC) to monitor the lives of its’ citizens to the point where newspapers are limited on what they can print and print from readers, Continue reading

Support America – Shop at Lowe’s

A typical Lowe's storefront in Santa Clara, Ca...

Reference: Backlash for Lowe’s as ads pulled from Muslim show – Local News – Charlotte, NC – msnbc.com.

Really? When has it become wrong for a company to pull advertising or direct their advertising to their proper target demographics? Lowe’s pulled their ads from a TLC show called “All-American Muslims” due to complaints from true Americans. Unfortunately here in California, there is an idiot who wants to boycott Lowe’s for redirecting their advertising to another target demographic. And this idiot is an immigrant and running for State Senate. Continue reading