Pshhh! I scoff at your pathetic laws

Summer's End. Lexington Green, 11 September 20...

Summer’s End. Lexington Green, 11 September 2002. Photo taken in Minute Man National Historical Park. Sculpture : “Minuteman” by sculptor Henry Hudson Kitson (1863-1947), dedicated April 19, 1900. Erected 1899 : SIRIS (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Gun Control

Those two words have run rampant in the past year and will continue, as mass shootings have taken place throughout the United States.  The individuals who are committing these heinous crimes are in pure form, criminals.

Ladies and gentlemen, criminals are the lowest forms of wasted space within our confines of the United States. They are rejected specimens of society based on their inability to function, to follow rules and to exist amongst regular members of society. And lest they refuse to obey by the laws.

With that being said, who and what gives the government any idea that by passing stricter gun laws it will help reduce the crimes of shooting someone. The President and Vice-President along with the other monkeys of congress can run their gums all they want and come up with idiotic and senseless laws that will restrict the sane gun owners from acquiring firearms. However, since criminals do not follow laws nor care if they even exist, why would the government think that these tougher laws will make it harder for these crimes to exist.

What the members of government needs is a good strong open-handed slap upside the head to wake them from their fantasy ego power trips thinking that their “tougher” laws will solve the issues. Criminals find ways to acquire the tools they need.  Since the government is too lazy to enforce the rules that are already in place and too stupid to stop coming up with clueless and treasonist acts of giving weapons to terrorists and drug lords (Fast and Furious ring a bell), the putrid existence of human flesh we call criminals will continue their onslaught of killing innocent US citizens and in essence will be backed by the government.

On a side note, Nancy Pelosi its the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution, not the 1st, you moronic pretentious plastic waste of a government chair. Sit down, shut up and let your husband make the money. You have no right to be in any office of the government.

With tougher gun control laws, comes a hidden agenda of actually controlling the US citizens and limiting their powers of freedom. Criminals in any sense of the form should have no freedoms nor existence even though they will continue to get away with murder… literally.

To be President of the United States?

Seal of the President of the United States Esp...

The ignorance and lack of basic logic in the voting population has become a front-runner for incompetence and lack of American responsibilities within the White House and State and Local governments. Most registered voters today base their decision on a variety of issues that should not be regarded as a viable candidate for placing an American citizen within the presidency role or any state or local run top office.

These decision generating issues include the following:

You get the general idea. In simplest terms, the issues that do not really matter in terms of running the United States of America efficiently and productively in satisfying the general population needs of legal citizens and American businesses.  Each election year the candidates repeat the same psycho babble that was performed the years past. Reciting repetitive soulless promises geared towards the groups that providing the most grease in the hands, playing on the needs of tax relief, the needs of religious psychotics in the bible belt, and the needs of illegal immigrants and the general childish attempts to degrade and discredit the other candidates, is like an instinctual sparrow that would never veer from the normal migration to try a new path.

In the eyes of this American citizen, the previously mentioned issues are insignificant at the least. Open your mind and the minds of those less intelligent and consider the truth that the issues of religion, government intervention, marital issues, and past political stances are an absolute detriment to an effective presidential nominee. Let’s explain why.

Think for a minute about what the United States is in its simplest yet largest form…

The United States of America has the following:

  • Assets
  • Accounts Payables/Receivables
  • Competitors
  • Departments
  • Employees
  • Hierarchy of Management
  • Rules and Regulations
  • Services and Products

If the thought of a corporation comes to mind then you are correct. The United States of America is just that, a multi-trillion dollar partnership corporation. Explaining the correlation between the United States and a corporation will be left for Q & A in the comments for those not willing or incapable of putting the defined to different aspects of the United States. Boredom for the educated and logical would set in, if a full explanation of each example was to be included. Hereinafter, the United States will be referred to as “The Corporation”.

Since this correlation exists between the two, then why do voters and presidential hopefuls so concerned about meaningless issues that do not concern The Corporation. Issues and concerns by both voters and hopefuls should be focusing on bettering state of The Corporation. This country is in a turbulent downward spiral with no way of stopping the flushing of American values, ethics and preservation of this country, unless the citizens focus on the main issues. Those issues should only centralize on making The Corporation better as a whole internally. Government intervention into everyday family, religious and sexual lives should be set aside, foreign aid and intervention should be curtailed until our own citizens get food, education and monetary welfare to better themselves, taxes across the board (including state and local taxes) should be redefined as to create a better revolving door of cash flow for not only the federal, state and local governments but as well as the working class citizens, and our belts around our borders and illegal alien activity within these borders should be brought in tightly to extinguish the welfare that the illegal aliens are receiving criminally.

By focusing on the internal core values and structure of The Corporation, The Corporation just might be able to stop the degradation of society and financial worth. With all of this being said, one of the primary requirements of running for the President of the United States should be the following:

Any and all Presidential candidates are required to have successful experience running an American corporation, while a legal natural-born United States citizen, that has shown positive gains throughout the tenure of said candidates at such corporation. Required responsibilities include but not limited to; Judicial enforcement and construction of business laws and regulations, financial appropriations not detrimental to the corporation, delegations of authorities, and instrumental increases of productivity to product or services provided.

By limiting the candidacies to only those eligible by the above requirements, it would greatly reduce the chances, in this writers opinion, of electing into office any ego-centric righteous politician or lawyer without a business background. Neither, politicians nor lawyer, to the knowledge within, have experience running a corporation efficiently nor do they have the ethics nor morals to make decisions that would benefit the corporation as a whole and disregard other corporations requests and needs in the process. Focus on The Corporation, up to its borders and inclusively all within should be top priority, all to benefit the legal citizens and The Corporation as a whole and honestly this writer does not believe neither a crooked politician nor the plague of defused American rights lawyer has the ability to do so.

The United States legal citizens need a leader that is capable of running the country, for the good of the legal citizens of the United States. What the citizens do not need in a President, is one whom deferred to the needs and requirements of foreign bodies and their opportunistic leeches of aliens, as well one whom as never had the experience of running an organization and least but most important, one whom would rather cater to the direct benefactors and leeches then to the legal citizens and internal businesses en mass within the United States.

Irony has hit this year since one of the candidates has had business experience as mentioned earlier, Mitt Romney.

Do you agree or disagree with an upgraded requirement base for running for office, on the National, State or Local stage?

The word ‘Illegal’ is racist? In what dictionary?

Shut down this site: Drop the ‘I’ Word

Such a beautiful woman, disappointing that foul words spew from those lips

Monica Novoa, this is a public notice challenge to you, to present proof of concept that the word ILLEGAL is a racist term. The following will demonstrate to you, a supposed educated woman on what a racist slur is. Let’s give you a little help to understand that each slur you will find in the following is considered racist and each is definitive of a specific race of inhabitants of this world.

*Disclaimer: The following depicts sensitive and non-PC language. I am in no way a racists, but I am a firm believer that being politically correct is for those that are afraid to stand up for themselves and what they believe in. Though the following slurs are extremely racists and can cause extreme anger in some readers, remember that the following is for explanatory purposes only.

In the beginning of American history, the Injun’s encountered the Moon Crickets. Once Whitey established themselves, they found it easier to get someone else to do the hard labor. They sent ships to Africa and China to round-up Jungle Bunnies, Knuckle-Draggers, Rail Hoppers and Coolies. The Crackers kept Pickaninnies away from normal society, which was wrong and Abraham Lincoln freed what was once coined “Lincolns Mistake.” Beach Niggers began to hear their slave boys use a term to refer to each other intimately just between their own race, but Whitey wanted to be Wiggers and typical Honkies, so they adapted to calling the blacks Niggers as well. Even early in history there were Chocolate Dippers and Powder Fuckers producing Oreos and Urban Zebras

Later in history, Guerro’s battled the Spic’s, and for retribution from the loss to the US, the Wetbacks, Scratchbacks and Chili-Shitters began to cross into the US, legally of course. A few more battles between the US and other nations, involved the Yankees against the Nips, Charlies, Gooks, and Japs. Another war, but for the masses with the Boxheads or Nazis if you will, being their natural Jew-Killer selves, executing most likely the largest destruction of a race ever the Bagel-Dog, Hooknose Jews. This war culminated into a conglomerate of multi-races fighting such as the Red Pinko Commies, Tommy Tea Bag Brits, Dago Zip Grape Stompers and Chink Cookies.

After the major wars, life resumed in the US for the Rednecks and White Trash and their Ditchpigs living side by side with the Ghetto Brothers and Nappy-headed Hoes (courtesy of Don Imus) with their Ghetto Hamsters. Slowly the Beaner Taco Bender population began to grow rapidly with the Wetbacks and Scratchbacks making a run for the border in an attempt to perform in the Border Hopper olympics. This gave rise to more Oreos and zebras. Then the Yellow Zipperhead Slanteyes began immigrating making fun of the Roundeyes as they saw them walking the streets. Soon the US had become a melting pot, with Cab Niggers, Camel Jockies, Towel-heads and Flips and Gwats rushing in like water from the New Orleans Damn that broke.

All that is said and done, those Diaper headed Sand Niggers caused pandemonium and chaos for the US by killing thousands of Honkies, Niggers, Beaners, Jews, Zips, Chinks, Guidos and the like, even their own Fig Gobblers. For once in the history of the US, Whitey, Brothers, Spics, Kikes, Chinos, Yokos and Camel Cowboys united as one nation to rebuild and become stronger. The difference between these races and some of the Knuckle-Draggers, Wetbacks, Jews, Gooks and Sand-Niggers coming today… The unity was of LEGAL patriotic US citizens who pride themselves in loving this country and abiding and assimilating into the culture and laws. Unlike the ILLEGAL aliens, who come to this country, show patriotism not for the US but for their homeland (want proof, watch which flags rise up during marches and demonstrations), they do not assimilate and do not abide by the rules of the US, therefore they are breaking the law which is… ILLEGAL.

Understanding the term “racist slur” means comprehending the term “race.” All of the preceding slurs referred to a specific race, or common denominator physical characteristic of each group of people. The attempt within the stated website and Monica Novoa, and by the supportive derelict enemies of the United States is to essentially de-criminalize illegal aliens by taking out the word ILLEGAL. You may call it what you will;

but these cancerous parasites coming into this country ILLEGALLY are breaking the law, therefore they are performing an ILLEGAL act and since the governmental definition of an alien is any foreign person entering the US that is not a citizen, they are essentially ILLEGAL ALIENS. If you want to change the name, then lets come up with more precise terminology for these infesting law-breaking cretins such as;

  • Criminal Aliens/Immigrants
  • Crooked Aliens/Immigrants
  • Lawless Aliens/Immigrants
  • Undesirable Aliens/Immigrants
  • Unwanted Aliens/Immigrants

A quick look at one of the “terms” that this self-proclaimed “educated” woman, Monica Novoa, coined, NAFTA refugees. Are you not aware what NAFTA stands for, let alone what a refugee is? In case you were asleep during lectures in your useless path to an English degree let us refresh your memory.

NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Act which essentially lifted all non-tariff boundaries between Canada, North American and Mexico and eliminated most trade tariffs between the three countries immediately.

A refugee is an individual fleeing from some type of danger or political persecution. or one seeking asylum (most if not all the time from a country)

So logically let us get this correct Monica Novoa, you are basically telling the United States and its media by using the term of “NAFTA Refugee,” that these ILLEGAL aliens are seeking asylum in the United States from a trade agreement?

This fight and your explanation for removing the “I” word or “ILLEGAL” is baseless on the pure evidence that regardless of any means to “humanize” these ILLEGAL aliens, is still calling them ILLEGAL aliens, since what they are doing is illegal. By dropping this attempt at of mass asylum for ILLEGAL aliens, you will essentially save face from the American citizens whom have seen their rights taken away, and their liberties and freedoms givien away to those undeserving of such special treatment.

Interested parties of this article, how would you vote on this if it was put on the November ballot and why?

Why are criminals fighting to be laywers?

U.S. News – Can an illegal immigrant become a lawyer?.

Jose Manuel Godinez-Samperi

Political correctness is disregarded herein after. Why is it that Florida, the geriatric, capital of the US is the host of some of the most insane occurrences in the United States? They had

Casey Anthony, the murderer of her young daughter (Yes she murdered her daughter, I said it so what), then they have the Trayvon Martin case who was murdered in cold-blood by a wanna be cop (George Zimmerman) who is using the most insanely idiotic law of self-preservation I have ever heard (Stand your ground) and now an illegal immigrant, Jose Manuel Godinez-Samperio, mind you whom is breaking the law, is fighting to become a lawyer in the United States.

Oddly enough as it seems, that an illegal wants to become a lawyer and uphold the law of the land, that of which he is clearly breaking, the screwed up rotting brains of the decrepid geezers of the Florida Supreme Court are actually going to look into whether or not this illegal has the right to practice law in the US. Hey old gas-passers, here is the quick answer for you, “No, he is breaking the law already, so how can someone who is breaking the law be capable of defending the law.” Who cares if he was brought here by his illegal alien parents, he is still an illegal and should have no rights to become a lawyer, let alone should have been allowed to go to schools, get a law degree in an US university (without a green card or visa) and should definitely not be living here.

If this illegal scum wins his case, can you just imagine the consequences it would have on the legal system and the floodgates of illegals thinking they can sue to work here, get free aid and do what they please, all while breaking the law. This piece of Mexican trash is going to do one thing and one thing only if he wins, and that is fight and tie up the legal systems with frivolous lawsuits for illegal immigrants. I would say that any other state would look at his claim and laugh it off and tell him to leave. Oh contraire, where I live (The good ol’ safe haven for illegal aliens, California) the idiots in our Supreme Court would not only consider it, but also take him to lunch, wine and dine and find out what more he desires. Then Tony Villar (that is the male form of the name of LA Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa) would take him on the Long Beach Yacht that is wasting tax payers dollars (yes it is a yacht you illiterate dumbo-eared poor excuse for a mayor), and offer him a key to the city along with all of the free perks he desires. So Florida and California in this writers opinions are the worse places to be an American citizen, because here, the illegal pieces of trash from Mexico and any other degenerated country have more rights in these two states then naturally born citizens.

How can someone who is breaking the law even be considered for a law practice in the United States, if they are breaking the law already? Isn’t that like giving a bank robber a job at the National Treasury? Why can they be trusted to uphold law-abiding employment and trust when they are criminals.

What are your thoughts? Should Jose Manuel Godinez-Samperio be allowed to practice law in the United States, and explain your thoughts.

Do you think US courts should allow the use of other countries laws?

Colorized image of US President Theodore Roose...

Image via Wikipedia

Let’s just bow down to Islam and hand over our country: Appeals court affirms order blocking Oklahoma sharia law ban – latimes.com.

I am not sure if my comprehension of what this article is implying, but when the hell did it become expected for the United States court of law, to honor and take into consideration the laws of other countries. Anyone who believes that the United States should consider the law of another land during a court hearing should be either slapped upside the head and explained in length that this is the United States of America, or kicked out of the country for refusing to follow our laws and our legal system.  We have our own laws and own regulations, we do not bring together law and religion and we do not, nor will not honor or consider any other nations law. How dare these Muslims come to our country and expect us to consider the law of their land. Last time I checked, they were living in our country, therefore they must respect our laws and our constitution and should not expect the laws of their land to apply to any legal matters they will deal with in the United States justice system. Newsflash Muslims, anti-sharia laws are not unconstitutional, since this is the United States of America, the laws that are governed through sharia do not apply within any court of law within our borders.  If you don’t agree with that then, oh well that is not our problem.  I guess you will have to deal with our laws Continue reading

2012 New Year’s Resolution – #1: The United States, the one and only priority

United (States) Parcel Service.

Well here we are, one day away from New Year‘s eve and I am ashamed, I am prejudice and I am angered. Why you ask? Well I will tell you why. I live in a country that once cared about its citizens, they once wanted their people to succeed and to thrive and they put our country, the United States, first and foremost. We had leaders who strived to preserve the integrity of our great nation and preserve the core beliefs for which this country was built upon. The United States put its country and citizens first.

I can only fathom the responses to what is about to spew from the hole in my face that sometimes I cannot control. Yet I am pleased and eager to proceed with what is about to be said. (Deep cleansing breath, inhale… exhale…) Over the course of a few years, we as Americans have seen destruction and devastation across the globe. Just to name a few, the earthquake in Japan, famine and riots in Somalia and well I don’t really care about those other countries. Natural disasters happen almost every year and every time one happens, take a wild and obvious guess on who is there to send aid, whether is be monetary or nutritional, to these devastated regions of the globe. If you guessed, our country the United States then you are as smart as I thought you were. We, here, do not have many natural disasters, at least of large magnitudes, but the last one we had devastated our southern border states with a courtesy ravaging by Hurricane Katrina. Again take a guess on who gave us aidContinue reading

2012 New Year’s Resolution – #2: Abolish Illegal Immigration benefits

Immigrant rights march for amnesty in downtown...

Mostly every legal citizen of the United States has at least two things in common. One, either individually or our ancestors immigrated to the United States. And two, either individually or our ancestors assimilated to the cultures, laws and regulations and language spoken here. The purpose to immigrate here was to get away from persecution and the rule of a religious tyranny and to build a better life for ones’ self and the family. In order to be accepted here, one had to commit to assimilating into the culture and taking a vow a celibacy to one and only one country, the United States. Our ancestors left behind a land that they no longer desired and to take an oath of dedication to their new mother land, the United States. These people, our ancestors and you and I, we are called Americans plain and simple.

So why is it that now, blacks, mexicans, chinese and so forth are considering themselves; African-American, Mexican-American, Chinese-American? You are American plain and simple. If you are a legal citizen of this great nation, shut the hell up about calling yourself these ridiculous monikers because you are not any of those, you are an American.

Apologies for the off base rant. And apologies for the focus on one race within this resolution, due to the sheer number of this type of illegal it is only fair to reference this race. Back to the focus of this resolution. Continue reading