Pshhh! I scoff at your pathetic laws

Summer's End. Lexington Green, 11 September 20...

Summer’s End. Lexington Green, 11 September 2002. Photo taken in Minute Man National Historical Park. Sculpture : “Minuteman” by sculptor Henry Hudson Kitson (1863-1947), dedicated April 19, 1900. Erected 1899 : SIRIS (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Gun Control

Those two words have run rampant in the past year and will continue, as mass shootings have taken place throughout the United States.  The individuals who are committing these heinous crimes are in pure form, criminals.

Ladies and gentlemen, criminals are the lowest forms of wasted space within our confines of the United States. They are rejected specimens of society based on their inability to function, to follow rules and to exist amongst regular members of society. And lest they refuse to obey by the laws.

With that being said, who and what gives the government any idea that by passing stricter gun laws it will help reduce the crimes of shooting someone. The President and Vice-President along with the other monkeys of congress can run their gums all they want and come up with idiotic and senseless laws that will restrict the sane gun owners from acquiring firearms. However, since criminals do not follow laws nor care if they even exist, why would the government think that these tougher laws will make it harder for these crimes to exist.

What the members of government needs is a good strong open-handed slap upside the head to wake them from their fantasy ego power trips thinking that their “tougher” laws will solve the issues. Criminals find ways to acquire the tools they need.  Since the government is too lazy to enforce the rules that are already in place and too stupid to stop coming up with clueless and treasonist acts of giving weapons to terrorists and drug lords (Fast and Furious ring a bell), the putrid existence of human flesh we call criminals will continue their onslaught of killing innocent US citizens and in essence will be backed by the government.

On a side note, Nancy Pelosi its the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution, not the 1st, you moronic pretentious plastic waste of a government chair. Sit down, shut up and let your husband make the money. You have no right to be in any office of the government.

With tougher gun control laws, comes a hidden agenda of actually controlling the US citizens and limiting their powers of freedom. Criminals in any sense of the form should have no freedoms nor existence even though they will continue to get away with murder… literally.

Let the murderers live while those murdered never experienced life

Paying the death penalty for crime - garroting...

An eye for an eye. U.S. News – California voters to consider ending capital punishment.

The death penalty, some want it abolished, others want it to stay, and still others think the process to rid this earth of a disease like a murderer slowly seeps along like sap from a Maple tree. Yet righteous wackos, along with those soulless deranged criminal attorneys think that the death penalty is an unjust, cruel and inhumane way of dealing with those that take it upon themselves to end someone elses life. Hurt feelings about what was said about criminal attorneys, to bad keep reading. Apologies, but anyone who feels that a criminal should get compensation, in some form, for hurting themselves on someones property during a crime, or committing murder, should be hung and disbarred from practicing law. Shame on you for even fathom the thought that these criminals deserve any rights or liberties.

Yet digression has set in. The arguments for abolishing the death penalty are minimal at best. They claim, and I agree, that it is costing Californians millions of dollars, the other claim, and I laugh cold heartedly at this, is that it is cruel and unusual punishment and inhumane and unjust. Wait, what are you wackos smoking? Did you get your weed from the Inland Empire, San Bernardino county region or what? Why should these murderers receive anything less than a cruel and inhumane execution? These cave dwelling uneducated criminals did not spare any cruelty or humanity when they decided to brutally kill another human being.

And to touch on the other claim or should I say fact in regards to the astronomical cost of retribution that is administered for the death penalty. Why does it cost approximately 300 million tax payer dollars to convict and execute these worthless humans, for outreaching the cost to house them per year for the rest of their life ($90,000 per year)? The reason is ladies and gentlemen, is because the law allows it. We allow these criminals to perform countless appeals on their convictions, which takes up tax dollars to pay for defense attorneys, legal fees and union workers (i.e. Police, Prison Guards and state civil workers), all of this to try to overturn a conviction that originally contained enough evidence to convict the person. No apologies if this hurts any readers feelings, but if there is enough credible evidence, not to mention eye witnesses or any type of media that directly implicates someone in a crime of such a horrendous nature, then there should be no appeals what so ever; “You did the crime, the verdict has been read and your sentence will begin and your execution date is on such and such date. Next case!”

Here is a logical thought, who cares about the pain and suffering these death row inmates succumb to in the execution, they had no consideration for the pain and suffering of their victims so they are due no just respect from anyone or any legal entity. Same that 300 million dollars, but a .45 Magnum Revolver and load each chamber with a hallow point round. Stand the convict against the wall, point the revolver at their head and pull the trigger. Let us see here what this will eliminate; A bullet to the brain eliminates any pain and suffering from the instantaneous explosion of brain matter, and $299,999,750 California tax dollars are now saved from purchasing a basic hand gun. Not to mention that would save an extra $90,000 per year from having to store these useless individuals in our jail systems.

Back in Jan. 31, 2002, Chris Clem, JD, Attorney at Samples, Jennings, Ray & Clem, PLLC, stated the following:

Executions do not have to cost that much. We could hang them and re-use the rope. No cost! Or we could use firing squads and ask for volunteer firing squad members who would provide their own guns and ammunition. Again, no cost.”

Come on America, stop being so damn yellow-bellied and spineless and show criminals and those thinking of creating horrendous crimes that we are not going to tolerate it and there is a dire consequence if they do commit any such act. That is the problem with some American citizens today, they believe through their righteous self-centered ways that everyone should be shown kindness and forgiveness, but hear this, if one of these criminals performed any such action on these book thumping individuals they would be calling for the person’s head.

What are your thoughts on the death penalty? Any thoughts of why these criminals should be shown leniency and pardoned from their death sentence to a life in prison instead costing California much-needed tax dollars?

Do you think US courts should allow the use of other countries laws?

Colorized image of US President Theodore Roose...

Image via Wikipedia

Let’s just bow down to Islam and hand over our country: Appeals court affirms order blocking Oklahoma sharia law ban – latimes.com.

I am not sure if my comprehension of what this article is implying, but when the hell did it become expected for the United States court of law, to honor and take into consideration the laws of other countries. Anyone who believes that the United States should consider the law of another land during a court hearing should be either slapped upside the head and explained in length that this is the United States of America, or kicked out of the country for refusing to follow our laws and our legal system.  We have our own laws and own regulations, we do not bring together law and religion and we do not, nor will not honor or consider any other nations law. How dare these Muslims come to our country and expect us to consider the law of their land. Last time I checked, they were living in our country, therefore they must respect our laws and our constitution and should not expect the laws of their land to apply to any legal matters they will deal with in the United States justice system. Newsflash Muslims, anti-sharia laws are not unconstitutional, since this is the United States of America, the laws that are governed through sharia do not apply within any court of law within our borders.  If you don’t agree with that then, oh well that is not our problem.  I guess you will have to deal with our laws Continue reading

2012 New Year’s Resolution – #2: Abolish Illegal Immigration benefits

Immigrant rights march for amnesty in downtown...

Mostly every legal citizen of the United States has at least two things in common. One, either individually or our ancestors immigrated to the United States. And two, either individually or our ancestors assimilated to the cultures, laws and regulations and language spoken here. The purpose to immigrate here was to get away from persecution and the rule of a religious tyranny and to build a better life for ones’ self and the family. In order to be accepted here, one had to commit to assimilating into the culture and taking a vow a celibacy to one and only one country, the United States. Our ancestors left behind a land that they no longer desired and to take an oath of dedication to their new mother land, the United States. These people, our ancestors and you and I, we are called Americans plain and simple.

So why is it that now, blacks, mexicans, chinese and so forth are considering themselves; African-American, Mexican-American, Chinese-American? You are American plain and simple. If you are a legal citizen of this great nation, shut the hell up about calling yourself these ridiculous monikers because you are not any of those, you are an American.

Apologies for the off base rant. And apologies for the focus on one race within this resolution, due to the sheer number of this type of illegal it is only fair to reference this race. Back to the focus of this resolution. Continue reading